z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Does Planning Belong to the Politics of the Past?
Author(s) -
Barbara Czarniawska
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
contemporary economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1897-9254
DOI - 10.5709/ce.1897-9254.66
Subject(s) - politics , function (biology) , business , planned economy , private sector , similarity (geometry) , public relations , marketing , political science , economic system , economics , economic growth , computer science , law , evolutionary biology , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , biology
According to many authors, so-called “central planning” had disappeared from European countries by 1989. However, this is by no means certain. Many former centrally planned economies still engage in central planning, in both the private and public sectors. Moreover, there is a striking similarity between so-called “strategic planning” in large private and public units and central planning in a small-sized economy. These similarities and differences are examined in this article using several examples, concluding with city planning. The analysis suggests that city politicians may find useful lessons in organization studies, revealing that while planning has a powerful comforting and tranquilizing function, plans, like tools, need to be abandoned when they are obsolete or cumbersome. Additionally, planners and managers may find it useful to admit that the differences between the private and public sectors are not as large as conventionally assumed and that their activities are always connected to politics

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom