A Categorization Scheme for Assessing Pharmacy Students' Levels of Reflection During Internships
Author(s) -
Andy Wallman,
Åsa Kettis Lindblad,
Stina Hall,
Annika Lundmark,
Lena Ring
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
american journal of pharmaceutical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.796
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1553-6467
pISSN - 0002-9459
DOI - 10.5688/aj720105
Subject(s) - internship , categorization , inter rater reliability , pharmacy , medical education , reliability (semiconductor) , psychology , test (biology) , reflection (computer programming) , medicine , computer science , family medicine , artificial intelligence , programming language , paleontology , developmental psychology , power (physics) , rating scale , physics , quantum mechanics , biology
OBJECTIVETo test the reliability, feasibility, and responsiveness of a categorization scheme for assessing pharmacy students' levels of reflection during internships.METHODSPharmacy interns at Uppsala University were asked to write a reflective essay about patient counseling at the start and end of their internships. A modified version of Kember's categorization scheme for assessing the level of reflection was used to evaluate these essays.RESULTSBased on their essay scores, the students' levels of reflection increased during the internship course (p < 0.001) The mean time for categorization was 3 minutes per essay. The interrater reliability of the 182 essays was kappa = 0.63.CONCLUSIONSThe evaluation of the categorization scheme showed that it has good interrater reliability, feasibility, and responsiveness. This scheme might be useful in pharmacy practice educational settings, but needs further validation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom