The California Critical Thinking Instruments for Benchmarking, Program Assessment, and Directing Curricular Change
Author(s) -
Charles R. Phillips,
Renae J. Chesnut,
Raylene M. Rospond
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
american journal of pharmaceutical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.796
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1553-6467
pISSN - 0002-9459
DOI - 10.5688/aj6804101
Subject(s) - pharmacy , benchmarking , curriculum , critical thinking , disposition , test (biology) , referent , medical education , percentile , percentile rank , psychology , medicine , mathematics education , pedagogy , family medicine , social psychology , statistics , mathematics , management , paleontology , linguistics , philosophy , economics , biology
Objectives. To assess pharmacy students' critical thinking (CT) measures and identify areas for curricular reform. Methods. Pharmacy students were given the California Critical Thinking Skills Test and Disposition Index at various points in the PharmD program. Scores were compared with a national referent group and evaluated for changes across the curriculum and between classes. Results. Students were comparable to national norms. Pretest and posttest scores for total disposition showed improvement. Scores in all subcategories except for truth-seeking were consistently above 40. The CT skills of the pharmacy students varied compared with those of referent students, but the pharmacy students' overall score of 18 was in the 73rd percentile. Pre- and post-skills scores showed improvement. Students scoring low on the pretest improved more than those scoring high. Conclusions. Students had a consistent disposition towards CT and compared favorably to national norms. Both disposition and skills improved across ...
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom