z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative Effectiveness Evaluation as Outcomes Research
Author(s) -
JongMyon Bae
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of the korean society of hypertension
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2233-8454
pISSN - 2233-8136
DOI - 10.5646/jksh.2012.18.1.24
Subject(s) - comparative effectiveness research , randomized controlled trial , meta analysis , clinical trial , medicine , health technology , health care , linkage (software) , systematic review , medline , medical physics , alternative medicine , surgery , political science , biochemistry , chemistry , pathology , law , gene
❙ABSTRACT❙ In spite of being several results of efficacy obtained by randomized controlled trials about new health technologies, evidences related to real effectiveness confirmed by head-to-head direct comparison should be needed in order to improve qualities of healthcare. The comparative effectiveness evaluation (CEE) as outcomes research have suggested as the important tool for developing evidence-based information to patients, clinicians, and other decision makers about which technologies are most effective for which patients under specific circumstances. Four major methods of outcomes research are applied as systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cohort studies using registries, linkage of large databases, and pragmatic clinical trials. Through activating the CEE, the best and most effective technologies should be adopted rapidly in routine clinical practices. (J Korean Soc Hypertens 2012;18(1):24-28)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom