Enforcement of Security Rights in Residential Immovable Property and Consumer Protection: An Assessment of Estonian and Norwegian Law

This article concentrates on certain consumer protection issues in Estonian and Norwegian law in proceedings for the enforcement of security rights in residential immovable property. These issues are discussed in the context of European Union (EU) law as the recent Aziz case of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)and the new Mortgage Credit Directive (MCD) have begun to set new standards for enforcement proceedings which Member States must follow. The authors conclude that no legislative amendments are currently required in either of the two countries: the Estonian and Norwegian rules on acceleration and default interest clauses, as well as on enforcement proceedings, seem to be well in line with the requirements set by Azizand by the MCD. Some of the national provisions allow for rather wide discretion, however, and it is possible that the future case law of the CJEU regarding the Unfair Terms Directive, the MCD and the Charter of Fundamental Rights will continue to create new standards for the effective protection of consumers in the enforcement of security rights. The current wave of developments seems to include a growing fundamental rights aspect as the individual’s right to housing is being increasingly promoted through consumer protection norms