z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Regeneration of aspen following partial and strip understory protection harvest in boreal mixedwood forests
Author(s) -
Alison D Lennie,
Simon M. Landhäusser,
Victor J. Lieffers,
Derek Sidders
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
the forestry chronicle
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.335
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1499-9315
pISSN - 0015-7546
DOI - 10.5558/tfc85631-4
Subject(s) - understory , sucker , basal area , canopy , taiga , clearcutting , regeneration (biology) , silviculture , boreal , environmental science , forestry , agronomy , natural regeneration , agroforestry , biology , botany , ecology , geography , anatomy , microbiology and biotechnology
Trembling aspen regeneration was studied in 2 types of partial harvest systems designed to harvest mature aspen but protect immature spruce and encourage natural aspen regeneration. Two partial harvest systems, where the residual aspen was either left in strips or was dispersed uniformly, were compared to traditional clearcuts. After the first and second year since harvest, aspen sucker density and growth was similar between the 2 partial harvests, but was much lower than in the clearcuts. However, in the partial cuts the regeneration density was very much dependent on the location relative to residual trees. The density of regeneration was inversely related to the basal area of residual aspen; however, sucker height was inversely related to the basal area of the residual spruce. Although there were adequate numbers of suckers after partial harvest, their viability and contribution to the long-term productivity of these mixedwood stands is not clear.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom