z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Does interdisciplinary research require interdisciplinary education?
Author(s) -
Jay A. Anderson
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
the forestry chronicle
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.335
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1499-9315
pISSN - 0015-7546
DOI - 10.5558/tfc81785-6
Subject(s) - curriculum , discipline , generality , engineering ethics , set (abstract data type) , graduate education , frontier , sociology , scope (computer science) , pedagogy , political science , psychology , social science , engineering , computer science , law , programming language , psychotherapist
This paper presents an alternative view to some of the ideas put forth in The Forestry Chronicle (Vol. 81, No. 3) by arguing for a disciplinary approach to graduate-level education. There appears to be a diverging dichotomy between the educational requirements of forest managers and forest researchers. Forest managers today are barraged by an increasingly broad set of problems, and therefore likely benefit from an interdisciplinary education at the undergraduate level. In stark contrast to this generality, modern forest researchers solve problems so intricate and complicated that often only those specialists on the frontier of an academic discipline can contribute—which is why graduate-level curricula should, for the most part, remain disciplinary. Key words: forest management, forest research, undergraduate-level curricula, graduate-level curricula, disciplinarity

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom