English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Two methods for estimating the total outside-bark stem volume of all trees in young plantations of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) and black spruce (Picea mariana [Mill.] B.S.P.) were compared. The first method was time-intensive, and required destructive sampling to obtain volume estimates using many paired diameter/height measurements. The second method was nondestructive and required only two field measurements: an outside-bark diameter at either a fixed height (such as breast height) or at a relative height, and the total stem height. The results indicated that total plantation volume estimates to within ±5% can be obtained using the power function model and two stem measurements: a diameter at a relative height of 30% from the base of the stem and total stem height. The power function model offers a good alternative for accurately assessing plantation volume. Key words: black spruce, jack pine, power function volume model, paracone, upper diameters, profile shape, stem volume

Nondestructive volume estimates of 11-year-old jack pine and black spruce using the power function volume model