z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Conflicting Objectives in Forest Policy: The Case of British Columbia
Author(s) -
Peter H. Pearse
Publication year - 1970
Publication title -
the forestry chronicle
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.335
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1499-9315
pISSN - 0015-7546
DOI - 10.5558/tfc46281-4
Subject(s) - endowment , yield (engineering) , forest management , value (mathematics) , resource (disambiguation) , business , environmental resource management , ecoforestry , natural resource economics , economics , geography , forestry , political science , computer science , ecology , forest restoration , forest ecology , computer network , materials science , machine learning , law , metallurgy , ecosystem , biology
This paper takes a critical look at some of the basic principles on which forest management policies in British Columbia are based. Much of our present management procedures are designed to serve technical objectives which can be traced to traditional forestry principles imported from Europe. These, it is suggested, are inappropriate criteria for maximizing the value we obtain from our forest endowment in modern conditions of rapid change and growing competitive demands on the resource base. It is argued that our well established concepts of sustained yield, full utilization and maximum wood growth, among other things, should be re-appraised in the light of modern economic criteria for maximizing the values generated by forest resources.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom