z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sustainable Agriculture Irrigation Management: The Water-Energy-Food Nexus in Pajaro Valley, California
Author(s) -
Christopher A. Wada,
Kimberly Burnett,
Jason J. Gurdak
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
sustainable agriculture research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1927-0518
pISSN - 1927-050X
DOI - 10.5539/sar.v5n3p76
Subject(s) - nexus (standard) , business , agriculture , sustainability , food energy , incentive , natural resource economics , water resources , environmental resource management , environmental science , resource (disambiguation) , environmental economics , water resource management , economics , computer science , geography , ecology , archaeology , computer network , biochemistry , chemistry , microeconomics , biology , embedded system
The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus is quickly becoming one of the most critical global environmental challenges of the twenty first century. However, WEF systems are inherently complex; they typically are dynamic and span multiple land or agro-ecosystems at a regional or global scale. Addressing this challenge requires a systems approach to optimal and sustainable resource management across multiple dimensions. To that end, using Pajaro Valley (California) as a case study, our research aims to (1) highlight synergies and tradeoffs in food and water production, (2) build a dynamic framework capable of examining intertemporal resource relationships, and (3) detail the steps required to develop incentive-compatible financing of the resulting management plans when benefits are not distributed uniformly across users. Using a stylized model, we find that in the long run, inland growers benefit from the halting of seawater intrusion (SWI) due to overpumping of groundwater. We also calculate that the water provided by the proposed College Lake Multi-Objective Management Program-a plan designed to halt SWI and support sustainable water and agricultural development in the region-will generate net revenue of $40-58 million per year, compared to an annualized cost of less than $3 million. An equal cost-sharing plan would be desirable if the benefit of the project exceeded $1,268 per year for each well owner. Since this may not necessarily be the case for smaller well owners, one possible alternative is to allocate costs in proportion to expected benefits for each user.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom