Effectiveness and Remedies of the Arbitral Awards in OHADA (1)’s System and in People’s Republic of China. | Zendy

Mamoudou Samassekou | Zendy; Song Lianbin | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Effectiveness and Remedies of the Arbitral Awards in OHADA (1)’s System and in People’s Republic of China.

Author(s) -

Mamoudou Samassekou,

Song Lianbin

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

journal of politics and law

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 1913-9055

pISSN - 1913-9047

DOI - 10.5539/jpl.v4n1p63

Subject(s) - china , arbitration , scope (computer science) , context (archaeology) , economic justice , phenomenon , business , people's republic , globalization , space (punctuation) , political science , law , economic growth , economics , philosophy , computer science , biology , programming language , paleontology , linguistics , physics , quantum mechanics

Today the arbitral justice has experienced an exceptional development. It is a universal phenomenon which requires the involvement of all economic and legal players of developed and developing countries.

OHADA is a common business law and wish to secure legal security for regional and foreign economic agents by offering a vast economic space. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is an emerging country which increases its economic outlets in a context of globalization. This natural interdependence will increase the scope of economic exchanges, which may generate some disputes in businesses.

This article aims to compare two legal systems in the international commercial arbitration field: the legal system of OHADA and the PRC’s legal system; especially in the effectiveness and the remedies of the arbitrators’ decisions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research