English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Copyright © 2019 Phcog.Net. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Cite this article : Rosenberger N, Capitani ED, Hoey S, Kilroy D, Kumar AHS. Lumbosacral Biometrics and its Relevance to Patient-Specific Evaluation of Bone Mechanical Strength in Some Canine Breeds. BEMS Reports. 2019;5(1):59. ABSTRACT Lumbosacral problems are commonly encountered in canine practice. However, breed specific biometric data of the lumbosacral vertebrae are lacking. Such biometric data may be useful to assess the predisposition of an individual animal or breed to lumbosacral defects, or in the events of such defects may help select an optimal surgical correction strategy. This study used digital radiographs and dissections of cadavers to develop the following biometric parameters of lumbar vertebra 7 and the sacrum: Area-Mean Grey Value Ratio (AMR) and Height-Length Ratio (HLR). The AMR and HLR values were compared between the following four canine breed categories i.e., Working Breeds (WB), Large Breeds (LB), Giant Breeds (GB) and Cross Breeds (CB). Additionally, we compared the AMR and HLR values between 10 different dog breeds. We observed significant differences in the AMR and HLR values between the various dog breeds as well as the HLR values within the canine breed categories. We consider that the differences observed in the AMR and HLR values warrant exploring the feasibility of including these biometric measurements into digital imaging systems to enhance understanding of the mechanical features of bone.