z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Conflict between Adonijah and Solomon in Light of Succession Practices Near and Far
Author(s) -
Andrew Knapp
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of hebrew scriptures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1203-1542
DOI - 10.5508/jhs29557
Subject(s) - throne , successor cardinal , ecological succession , accession , history , ancient history , classics , political science , law , economics , ecology , biology , international trade , politics , mathematical analysis , mathematics , european union
The protocols for succession to the throne in ancient Israel and Judah have attracted little scholarly attention. In this article I first survey monarchic societies throughout history to show that there are no universally valid succession principles, despite scholars often treating primogeniture as such. I then look at evidence from ancient Near Eastern societies and suggest that in a “standard” scenario the incumbent king was expected to select a successor from a pool of viable candidates. I conclude by rereading Solomon’s accession to David’s throne in 1 Kings 1-2 in light of this.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom