English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this article is to assess the effectiveness of post-survey adjustments made to electoral polls in order to correct for non-response bias. To do so we have used different weighting and multiple imputation methods using pre-election and post-election polls conducted by Spain's Centre for Sociological Research for all Spanish general elections since 1982. The results show the benefit of weighting by past vote when voters’ preferences remain stable. However, the use of multiple imputation techniques to address missing values has a limited effect and is influenced by the variables included in the model.

El efecto de la ponderación y la imputación en el sesgo de los estudios electorales en España