Comparison among Different Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Adolescent Hypertension
Author(s) -
Silvia Totaro,
Franco Rabbia,
Ivana Rabbone,
Michele Covella,
E. Berra,
C. Fulcheri,
Silvia Di Monaco,
Elisa Testa,
Franco Veglio
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
isrn hypertension
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2090-8709
DOI - 10.5402/2013/107915
Subject(s) - percentile , medicine , gold standard (test) , pediatrics , test (biology) , screening test , population , diagnostic test , diagnostic accuracy , family medicine , environmental health , statistics , paleontology , mathematics , biology
The diagnosis of childhood hypertension based upon percentile tables proposed by the international guidelines is complex and often a cause of underdiagnosis, particularly among physicians who have not had specific training in the field of adolescent hypertension. The use of a simple and accurate screening test may improve hypertension diagnosis in adolescents. The aim of our study is to compare the different screening methods currently used in the literature to improve the diagnosis of childhood hypertension. We have conducted a cross-sectional population-based study of 1412 Caucasian adolescents among students of public junior high schools of Turin, Italy. In this population we have defined the hypertensive status with four different screening tests: BPHR, Somu's equations, Ardissino, and Kaelber methods. Finally, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of the 4 screening tests with the gold standard. Our analysis identifies in BPHR the test which combines ease of use and diagnostic accuracy.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom