z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Spinal versus General Anaesthesia in Postoperative Pain Management during Transurethral Procedures
Author(s) -
Stavros Ι. Tyritzis,
Konstantinos Stravodimos,
Ioanna Vasileiou,
Georgia Fotopoulou,
G. Koritsiadis,
V. Migdalis,
Anastasios Michalakis,
Constantinos Constantinides
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
isrn urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2090-5815
pISSN - 2090-5807
DOI - 10.5402/2011/895874
Subject(s) - medicine , spinal anesthesia , anesthesia , pain management , postoperative pain , general anaesthesia , surgery
We compared the analgesic efficacy of spinal and general anaesthesia following transurethral procedures. 97 and 47 patients underwent transurethral bladder tumour resection (TUR-B) and transurethral prostatectomy (TUR-P), respectively. Postoperative pain was recorded using an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS score was greatest at discharge from recovery room for general anaesthesia ( P = 0.027). The pattern changed significantly at 8 h and 12 h for general anaesthesia's efficacy ( P = 0.017 and P = 0.007, resp.). A higher VAS score was observed in pT2 patients. Patients with resected tumour volume >10 cm 3 exhibited a VAS score >3 at 8 h and 24 h ( P = 0.050, P = 0.036, resp.). Multifocality of bladder tumours induced more pain overall. It seems that spinal anaesthesia is more effective during the first 2 postoperative hours, while general prevails at later stages and at larger traumatic surfaces. Finally, we incidentally found that tumour stage plays a significant role in postoperative pain, a point that requires further verification.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom