Influence of thickness and incisal extension of indirect veneers on the biomechanical behavior of maxillary canine teeth
Author(s) -
Victória Luswarghi Souza Costa,
João Paulo Mendes Tribst,
Eduardo Shigueyuki Uemura,
Dayana Campanelli de Morais,
Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
restorative dentistry and endodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2234-7666
pISSN - 2234-7658
DOI - 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e48
Subject(s) - veneer , materials science , crown (dentistry) , maxillary central incisor , orthodontics , dentistry , maxillary canine , strain gauge , stress (linguistics) , composite material , medicine , linguistics , philosophy
The mathematical model for a maxillary canine tooth was validated using FEA. The thickness (0.3 or 0.8 mm) and the incisal covering showed no difference for the tooth structure. However, the incisal covering was harmful for the veneer, of which the greatest thickness was beneficial.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom