English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper uses the notion of climate regime provided by the International Relations literature and by interdisciplinary approaches on climate change. Such notion is important to understand the global normalization of the problem of climate change. Quantitative and qualitative data on greenhouse gas emissions, provided by Climate Sciences and the Economics of Climate Change, are used in order to present and discuss recent changes in emissions profiles of selected countries involved in the global climate governance. In line with these changes, the climate regime has also been transformed. The mentioned changes include the emergence of a "bottom-up" approach, represented by the Paris Agreement, which crowned the 21st Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change at the end of 2015. It is regarded as an alternative to "top-down" approach that characterized the negotiations under the aegis of the Kyoto Protocol. The discussion is based on the analysis of changes in profiles of greenhouse gas emissions by the countries that were part of the original architecture of the Kyoto Protocol, as well as other groupings that took shape during the successive rounds of negotiations, especially BASIC, a group formed by Brazil, South Africa, India and China. Recent interest configurations have been shown to give rise to new coalitions and leadership in negotiations on the issue, while reinforcing old conflicts and creating new tensions. Thus, the discussion proposed in this article should provide elements for understanding the directions of international climate negotiations that have led to a reconfiguration of the architecture of the climate regime, with substantive changes in terms of leadership, coalition of countries and attribution of responsibilities.

desenvolvimento e meio ambiente/desenvolvimento e meio ambiente

Do Protocolo Kyoto ao Acordo de Paris: uma análise das mudanças no regime climático global a partir do estudo da evolução de perfis de emissões de gases de efeito estufa