English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this article is to approach the hermeneutic reading of Kantian work proposed by Mario Caimi, for whom symbolism is the base of his metaphysical approach. We will begin by pointing out the unique interpretive character of humans and that this is at the base of the capacity for symbolism that they posess. Subsequently, we will create a succinct explanation of how analogies work in the process of the symbolic hypothesis. We will end with an approach to the character of limitation that the symbol possesses, and that, according to Caimi, is fundamental in the development of Kantian metaphysics.

El símbolo como limitación y tránsito en el sistema Kantiano