z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The “other side” of whistleblowing practice: Experiences from Nigeria
Author(s) -
Solomon I. Ifejika
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
rule of law and anti-corruption center
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2617-2763
pISSN - 2617-2755
DOI - 10.5339/rolacc.2018.4
Subject(s) - wrongdoing , dismissal , language change , business , government (linguistics) , work (physics) , denial , public relations , law and economics , public interest , law , political science , economics , psychology , engineering , mechanical engineering , art , linguistics , philosophy , literature , psychoanalysis
Whistleblowing, the act of reporting or disclosing wrongdoing, is widely proven to have a practically useful mechanism in fighting corruption in public and private sectors. Within the ambit of the whistleblowing framework, the disclosure of corrupt practices is primarily justifiable only on the ground that the action is genuinely directed towards protecting the interest of the public. The usual benefit of financial reward to whistleblowers is secondary, as it basically aims at encouraging individual employees to expose unethical misconducts in their organizations. Regardless of this, whistleblowing intrinsically benefits the public as well as the individual(s) who raises the alarm against any dishonest acts. However, despite its benefits to the public and the individual informant, whistleblowing attracts certain heavy costs, mainly on the part of the whistleblower, mostly in the form of victimization or witch hunting, retaliation, denial of work-related benefits, recrimination, suspension from work and ev...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom