z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Accountability Gaps in the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) Framework
Author(s) -
Argyro Karagianni,
Miroslava Scholten
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
utrecht journal of international and european law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2053-5341
DOI - 10.5334/ujiel.463
Subject(s) - accountability , judgement , accounting , mechanism (biology) , business , carry (investment) , public administration , economics , law and economics , political science , law , finance , philosophy , epistemology
The first judgement of the General Court (EU) pertaining to the Single Supervision Mechanism (SSM) raised an issue concerning the source of the shared supervisory powers in the system of EU prudential supervision. In the General Court’s view, the SSM Regulation conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) exclusive powers to carry out specific prudential supervisory tasks vis-a-vis all euro area credit institutions (significant and less significant). At the same time, the ECB’s national counterparts assist the former in implementing its supervisory tasks vis-a-vis less significant credit institutions. We argue that such a scheme requires a clear accountability relationship also between the ECB and the national competent authorities (NCAs), something that is not fully fledged in the current legal framework.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom