National Courts in the Frontline: Abuse of Rights under the Citizens’ Rights Directive
Author(s) -
Tamás Szabados
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
utrecht journal of international and european law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2053-5341
DOI - 10.5334/ujiel.417
Subject(s) - fundamental rights , political science , law , human rights , residence , international human rights law , reservation of rights , directive , economic justice , european union , right to property , sociology , business , demography , computer science , economic policy , programming language
The free movement and residence of Union citizens and their third country national family members may be restricted under Article 35 of Directive 2004/38/EC on the grounds of abuse of rights. Although the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had the opportunity to address abuse of rights cases, so far there have been no cases where it has established that abuse of rights took place. For this reason, the legal literature has tended to downplay the significance of the abuse of rights exception. The analysis of national case law, however, demonstrates that the courts of the Member States do apply Article 35 in its implemented form and have established abuse of rights on several occasions. Moreover, national courts have decided legal questions related to the abuse of rights which were not answered previously by the CJEU
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom