z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Psychology Data from an Exploration of the Effect of Anticipatory Stress on Disgust vs. Non-Disgust Related Moral Judgments
Author(s) -
Anna van 't Veer,
Willem W. A. Sleegers
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of open psychology data
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2050-9863
DOI - 10.5334/jopd.43
Subject(s) - disgust , psychology , moderation , social psychology , cognitive psychology , anger
In this lab-based experiment (N = 185, Tilburg University students) we tested the effect of anticipatory stress on moral condemnation. The data covers severity ratings for vignettes of two content types: vignettes with an inherent disgust-eliciting element (e.g., eating human flesh) and without (e.g., lying on a resume), filled out on computers using the survey platform Qualtrics. Participants in the anticipatory stress condition rated the vignettes as more morally wrong, and disgust-eliciting vignettes were rated as more morally wrong. No moderation by disgust content was found. Private Body Consciousness (PBC) was positively associated with condemnation for disgust-eliciting vignettes (but not with non-disgust-eliciting vignettes). The data can be used, for example, in research on incidental vs. inherent emotions, to identify the strength of induced emotions on judgments, and to identify moderators (e.g., PBC). Funding Statement: AV was funded by TIBER (Tilburg Institute of Behavioral Economics Research) at the time of data collection.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom