English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mp-MRI) is the current standard of reference for the local staging of prostate cancer (PCa). On the other hand, despite the low sensitivity and specificity of Technetium Bone Scanning (BS) for the detection of bone metastases (BM) and of Body Computed Tomography CT for the detection of lymph node metastases (LNM), these techniques are routinely used, in the current clinical practice. Nevertheless, whole Body MRI (WB-MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PET-CT) are emerging as robust tools for the staging of oncologic patients, including those with (PCa).  The available techniques (BS, WB-MRI, PET, CT) for the detection of BM in oncologic patients were compared and showed striking center differences in terms of anatomic sequences and planes used. This heterogeneity and the long acquisition time of WB-MRI protocols – due to the addition of multiple anatomic sequences in different planes – questioned whether a single three dimensional (3D) sequence could replace the multiple anatomic sequences used for node and bone staging of PCa. We demonstrated that WB-MRI is a credible tool for the detection of bone and node metastasis.  The second question addressed the possibility to obtain a complete TNM staging of PCa in a single MRI session. A WB-MRI protocol was developed to enable complete, T (local), N (regional) and M (distant) staging of PCa in a single session, in less than an hour. This ‘all-in-one’ protocol proved to be as efficient as the sum of exams currently in use for the staging of PCa (ie: mp-MRI of the prostate for ‘T’ staging, Thoraco-abdominal CT for ‘N’ staging and bone scintigraphy for ‘M’ staging).

Optimising TNM Staging of Patients with Prostate Cancer Using WB-MRI