English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Context: Optimal management in the diagnosis, treatment and support of cancer patients is increasingly associated with network-based models of care, an approach promoted by experts worldwide and pursued as a key objective in many national cancer plans. The Quebec national cancer plan proposed that fragmentation of care should be remedied through creating local cancer networks (LCNs). Objective: To measure to what extent a mandated cancer network, prescribed at the policy level but operationalized at the point-of-care, produce integration.

Is it worth reorganizing cancer services on the basis of network-based models to produce integration at the point-of-care? Lessons learned from Quebec