English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Purpose: The aim was to study the correspondence between MADRS-S and BDI-II selfassessment tools regarding outcome, among patients with depression within primary care. Theory: Symptoms of depression are common in primary care. A variety of self-assessment instruments are used in primary care in the diagnostic process and when monitoring treatment and depression outcome. Methods: We collected data from two on-going RCTs in the VG region in Sweden between the years 2010-2012. Primary care patients >18years with depression, assessed their symptoms with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) (doctor s and psychologist’s consultations) and Montgomery– Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S) (doctor’s and nurse’s consultations), at inclusion. Comparisons between the two instruments were determined by the intra class correlation and Cronbach’s alpha mean.

Comparison between self-assessments with MADRS-S and BDI-II instruments in patients with depression in Primary Care