z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness
Author(s) -
Xiaofeng Zheng,
Edward Cooper,
Y. Q. Zu,
Mark Gillott,
David Tetlow,
Saffa Riffat,
Christopher J. Wood
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
future cities and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.39
H-Index - 3
ISSN - 2363-9075
DOI - 10.5334/fce.66
Subject(s) - pulse (music) , leakage (economics) , building envelope , nozzle , envelope (radar) , engineering , piston (optics) , cabin pressurization , acoustics , mechanical engineering , structural engineering , electrical engineering , aerospace engineering , optics , physics , radar , wavefront , thermal , detector , meteorology , economics , macroeconomics
A pulse pressurisation technique is developed and utilised for determining building leakage at low pressure, based on a “quasi-steady pulse” concept. The underlying principle of the technique is to subject the building envelope to a known volume change in a short period of time (typically 1.5 s). The resulting pressure pulse is recorded, from which the leakage characteristic at low pressure is determined. The technique minimizes the effects of wind and buoyancy forces and has proven to be repeatable. It can use a compact and portable test rig and does not need to penetrate the building envelope. Therefore, it can obtain the leakage of a building very quickly and efficiently. Throughout the various stages of research and development of the pulse technique, experimental investigations have been carried out under different configurations and scenarios in order to validate the changes that have been made for the purpose of system development and optimisation. This paper provides an overview of experimental investigations in the validation process by covering comparison between blower door and pulse unit, comparison between piston-based pulse unit and nozzle-based pulse unit, testing with multiple pulse units in a large building, testing with a known opening, and testing in different building types with a range of volumes and airtightness levels. It enables us to understand the strengths and the limits of the pulse technique, from the experimental and practical perspectives. A good repeatability level (within ±5%) has been maintained throughout the various developmental stages and the average value of Q50/Q4 reported herein was in close agreement (

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom