Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module
Author(s) -
Lex Bosman
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
architectural histories
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.116
H-Index - 2
ISSN - 2050-5833
DOI - 10.5334/ah.cm
Subject(s) - selection (genetic algorithm) , process (computing) , column (typography) , architectural engineering , computer science , engineering , mechanical engineering , programming language , artificial intelligence , connection (principal bundle)
Architectural theorists have advocated the use of a module in the design process since the time of Vitruvius, but the responsibility for the creation of the module has remained largely unclear. The module has always been described as related or equal to the column shaft diameter. Since antiquity columns, for example, were mostly delivered in standard measures; the architect in charge was very limited in his selection of a module. In the 15th and 16th centuries, only gradually did theoreticians understand that here theory and practice were not in line. Things began to change with Vignola, who described a method for how to calculate the proper module for each individual design and building project
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom