z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Architectural Symbolism: Body and Space in Heinrich Wölfflin and Wilhelm Worringer
Author(s) -
Vlad Ionescu
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
architectural histories
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.116
H-Index - 2
ISSN - 2050-5833
DOI - 10.5334/ah.213
Subject(s) - relation (database) , space (punctuation) , modernity , perspective (graphical) , abstraction , philosophy , epistemology , architecture , metaphysics , aesthetics , art history , sociology , history , art , linguistics , visual arts , computer science , archaeology , database
The paper questions Jacques Rançière’s conception of the modern aesthetic regime as the correlation between visuality and language by returning to two fundamental figures of modern art history, Heinrich Wölfflin and Wilhelm Worringer. First, Wölfflin’s '“Prolegomena”' (1886) is interpreted as an attempt to conceive architectural space in terms of affectivity. Second, this conception of space is related to the Th. Vischer’s and J. Volkelt’s theory of symbolism. Third, the paper integrates this aesthetics in a model that conceives form as force (Goethe). Fourth, this modulation of affectivity that justifies architectural space is confronted with Wilhelm Worringer’s concept of abstraction. After all, this notion responds also to a conception of art in terms of space and affectivity. Finally, the paper debates the role of Wölfflin’s '“Prolegomena”' from the perspective of architectural design and its relation to modernity

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom