z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Thin Layer Drying Model of Sorghum
Author(s) -
HongSik Kim,
Oui-Woung Kim,
Hoon Kim,
Hyo-Jai Lee,
Jae-Woong Han
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of biosystems engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.208
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 2234-1862
pISSN - 1738-1266
DOI - 10.5307/jbe.2016.41.4.357
Subject(s) - sorghum , relative humidity , diffusion , thin layer , water content , materials science , grain drying , thermodynamics , humidity , mathematics , layer (electronics) , analytical chemistry (journal) , chemistry , composite material , chromatography , physics , agronomy , geotechnical engineering , biology , engineering
Hong-Sik Kim, Oui-Woung Kim, Hoon Kim, Hyo-Jai Lee, Jae-Woong Han* Research Group of Smart Food distribution system, Korea Food Research Institute, Sungnam 13539 Korea Division of Bio-Industry Engineering, Koungju National University, Yesan, 32439 Korea Received: August 31st, 2016; Revised: September 26th, 2016; Accepted: November 5th, 2016 Purpose: This study was performed to define the drying characteristics of sorghum by developing thin layer drying equations and evaluating various grain drying equations. Thin layer drying equations lay the foundation characteristics to establish the thick layer drying equations, which can be adopted to determine the design conditions for an agricultural dryer. Methods: The drying rate of sorghum was measured under three levels of drying temperature (40°C, 50°C, and 60°C) and relative humidity (30%, 40%, and 50%) to analyze the drying process and investigate the drying conditions. The drying experiment was performed until the weight of sorghum became constant. The experimental constants of four thin layer drying models were determined by developing a non-linear regression model along with the drying experiment results. Result: The half response time (moisture ratio = 0.5) of drying, which is an index of the drying rate, was increased as the drying temperature was high and relative humidity was low. When the drying temperature was 40°C at a relative humidity (RH) of 50%, the maximum half response time of drying was 2.8 h. Contrastingly, the maximum half response time of drying was 1.2 h when the drying temperature was 60°C at 30% RH. The coefficient of determination for the Lewis model, simplified diffusion model, Page model, and Thompson model was respectively 0.9976, 0.9977, 0.9340, and 0.9783. The Lewis model and the simplified diffusion model satisfied the drying conditions by showing the average coefficient of determination of the experimental constants and predicted values of the model as 0.9976 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.0236. Conclusion: The simplified diffusion model was the most suitable for every drying condition of drying temperature and relative humidity, and the model for the thin layer drying is expected to be useful to develop the thick layer drying model.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom