Performance Test of a Real-Time Measurement System for Horizontal Soil Strength in the Field
Author(s) -
Yong-Jin Cho,
DongHoon Lee,
Wonyeop Park,
Kyou-Seung Lee
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of biosystems engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.208
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 2234-1862
pISSN - 1738-1266
DOI - 10.5307/jbe.2016.41.4.304
Subject(s) - test (biology) , field (mathematics) , geotechnical engineering , environmental science , soil science , geology , mathematics , paleontology , pure mathematics
Strength in the Field Yongjin Cho, DongHoon Lee, Wonyeop Park, Kyouseung Lee* Dept. of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea Dept. of Bio-systems Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheonju, Korea Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Hankyong National University, Ansung, Korea Received: August 15th, 2016; Revised: September 13rd, 2016; Accepted: November 3rd, 2016 Purpose: Soil strength has been measured using a cone penetrometer, which is making it difficult to obtain the spatial data required for precision agriculture. Our objectives were to evaluate real-time horizontal soil strength (RHSS) to measure soil strength in real time while moving across the field. Using the RHSS data, the tillage depth was determined, and the power consumption of a tractor and rotavators were compared. Methods: The horizontal soil-strength index (HSSI) obtained by the RHSS was compared with the cone index (CI), which was measured using a cone penetrometer. Comparison analysis in accordance with the measurement depth that increased at 5-cm interval was conducted using kriged maps at six sensing depths. For tillage control and evaluation of the power consumption, the system was installed with a potentiometer for tillage depth, a torque sensor from the rear axle, and a power take-off (PTO) shaft. Results: The HSSI was lower than the CI, but they were the same at 54.81% of the total grids for the 5-cm depth and at 3.85% for the 10-cm depth. In accordance with the recommended tillage map, tillage operations between 0 and 15 cm left 2.3% and 7% residue cover on the soil, and that between 20 and 10 cm covered a wider utilization of 3% and 18.4%, respectively. When the tillage depth was 15 cm, the comparison result of the power requirements between the PTO and rear axle in terms of control performance revealed that the maximum power requirements of the axle and PTO were 44.63 and 23.24 kW, respectively. Conclusions: An HSSI measurement system was evaluated by comparison with the conventional soil strength measurement system (CI) and applied to a tractor to compare the tillage power consumption. Further study is needed on its application to various farm works using a tractor for precision agriculture.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom