English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Preventing the spread of infectious disease relies heavily upon the development and implementation of public health interventions The requisite debate over the effectiveness of these interventions is accompanied by discussions about which, if any, should be made mandatory We contend that efforts to mandate interventions in the fight to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have clear similarities to the long-standing efforts to establish and promote retail food safety interventions Specific similarities are that science is rarely the sole driver in deciding public health mandates and individuals' responses to them, compliance is key but can be difficult to achieve, and the concurrent incorporation of two or more interventions is a barrier against poor compliance As these factors have a direct effect on the success of public health mandates, understanding the role and relationships among them can aid government and public health officials in ongoing efforts to prevent foodborne illness and slow the spread of COVID-19

Interventions and compliance: How the response to COVID-19 reflects decades of retail food protection efforts