ADAPTING MULTIPLE-CHOICE ITEM-WRITING GUIDELINES TO AN INDUSTRIAL CONTEXT
Author(s) -
Robert M. Foster
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
citeseer x (the pennsylvania state university)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.5220/0002871400710074
Subject(s) - guideline , computer science , multiple choice , set (abstract data type) , domain (mathematical analysis) , context (archaeology) , sample (material) , taxonomy (biology) , information retrieval , statistics , medicine , mathematics , mathematical analysis , botany , pathology , programming language , chromatography , significant difference , biology , paleontology , chemistry
This paper proposes a guideline for writing MCQ items for our domain which promotes the use of Multiple Alternative Choice (MAC) items. This guideline is derived from one of the guidelines from the Taxonomy of item-writing guidelines reviewed by Haladyna et al, 2002. The new guideline is tested by delivering two sets of MCQ test items to a representative sample of candidates from the domain. One set of items complies with the proposed guideline and the other set of items does not. Evaluation of the relative effectiveness of the items in the experiment is achieved using established methods of item response analysis. The experiment shows that the new guideline is more applicable to the featured domain than the original
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom