z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
‘LURKER’ LITERACIES: LIVING IN/THROUGH NEIGHBORHOOD FACEBOOK GROUPS
Author(s) -
Gina Sipley
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
aoir selected papers of internet research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2162-3317
DOI - 10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11331
Subject(s) - literacy , appeal , citizen journalism , social media , participatory culture , online community , internet privacy , sociology , cyberpsychology , psychology , media studies , world wide web , political science , computer science , pedagogy , law
Although mythologized as a fringe or deviant behavior, ‘lurking,’ or passive participation in an online group, has become a regular part of the way we lead our lives online. In a discussion with Jenkins and Ito (2016), danah boyd questions the current emphasis on active online participation. She posits two salient questions: “Can someone be a valuable and participatory lurker?” and “What does high quality listening look like?”(Jenkins, Itō, & boyd, 2016, p.112). From a literacy studies perspective, “high quality listening” is a metaphor for reading, and reading is a highly active process. In Facebook groups, an optional feature for people to virtually gather around a common interest, where membership can be measured in the thousands, it is far more common to ‘lurk’, then it is to respond in words, shares, likes, memes, or emoji to content we have read.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom