z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Euphemisms and dysphemism: in search of a boundary line
Author(s) -
Bożena Duda
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.298
H-Index - 6
ISSN - 1576-4737
DOI - 10.5209/rev_clac.2011.v45.1
Subject(s) - euphemism , boundary (topology) , line (geometry) , natural (archaeology) , boundary line , computer science , range (aeronautics) , linguistics , communication , sociology , history , philosophy , engineering , mathematics , computer vision , mathematical analysis , geometry , archaeology , aerospace engineering
Straightforward remarks may sometimes be regarded as either an offence or an indelicacy. That is the reason why, to avoid the danger of being perceived vulgar or illmannered, language users prefer to employ a range of so-called concealing mechanisms available in any natural language, such as a euphemism or a dysphemism. This article is an attempt to explore the tremendously thin boundary line between the two concepts, as well as to provide examples of both

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom