Euphemisms and dysphemism: in search of a boundary line
Author(s) -
Bożena Duda
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.298
H-Index - 6
ISSN - 1576-4737
DOI - 10.5209/rev_clac.2011.v45.1
Subject(s) - euphemism , boundary (topology) , line (geometry) , natural (archaeology) , boundary line , computer science , range (aeronautics) , linguistics , communication , sociology , history , philosophy , engineering , mathematics , computer vision , mathematical analysis , geometry , archaeology , aerospace engineering
Straightforward remarks may sometimes be regarded as either an offence or an indelicacy. That is the reason why, to avoid the danger of being perceived vulgar or illmannered, language users prefer to employ a range of so-called concealing mechanisms available in any natural language, such as a euphemism or a dysphemism. This article is an attempt to explore the tremendously thin boundary line between the two concepts, as well as to provide examples of both
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom