
Neurophysiological Markers for Monitoring Exercise and Recovery Cycles in Endurance Sports
Author(s) -
Thomas Reichel,
Sebastian Hacker,
Jana Palmowski,
Tim Konstantin Boßlau,
Torsten Frech,
Paulos Tirekoglou,
Christopher Weyh,
Evita Bothur,
Stefan Samel,
R Walscheid,
Karsten Krüger
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of sports science and medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.815
H-Index - 65
ISSN - 1303-2968
DOI - 10.52082/jssm.2022.446
Subject(s) - physical medicine and rehabilitation , computer science , neurophysiology , medicine , physical therapy , psychiatry
The current study analyzes the suitability and reliability of selected neurophysiological and vegetative nervous system markers as biomarkers for exercise and recovery in endurance sport. Sixty-two healthy men and women, endurance trained and moderately trained, performed two identical acute endurance tests (running trial 1 and running trial 2) followed by a washout period of four weeks. Exercise protocol consisted of an acute running trial lasting 60 minutes. An intensity corresponding to 95% of the heart rate at individual anaerobic threshold for 40 minutes was followed by 20 minutes at 110%. At pre-exercise, post-exercise, three hours post-exercise and 24 hours post-exercise, experimental diagnostics on Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), heart rate variability (HRV), Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT), and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) were performed. Significant changes over time were found for all parameters ( p < .05). Furthermore, there was an approached statistical significance in the interaction between gender and training status in BDNF regulation (F (3) = 2.43; p = 0.06), while gender differences were found only for LF/HF-ratio (3hPoEx, F (3) = 3.40; p = 0.002). Regarding the reliability, poor ICC-values (< 0.5) were found for BDNF, Stroop sensitivity and pNN50, while all other parameters showed moderate ICC-values (0.5-0.75). Plasma-BDNF, SCWT performance, pain perception and all HRV parameters are suitable exercise-sensitive markers after an acute endurance exercise. Moreover, pain perception, SCWT reaction time and all HRV parameters show a moderate reliability, others rather poor. In summary, a selected neurophysiological and vegetative marker panel can be used to determine exercise load and recovery in endurance sports, but its repeatability is limited due to its vaguely reliability.