Bitcoin Mining as a Contest
Author(s) -
Nicola Dimitri
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
ledger
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2379-5980
DOI - 10.5195/ledger.2017.96
Subject(s) - contest , monopoly , victory , competition (biology) , microeconomics , economics , investment (military) , nash equilibrium , probabilistic logic , consumption (sociology) , simple (philosophy) , complete information , computer science , politics , law , artificial intelligence , ecology , social science , philosophy , epistemology , sociology , political science , biology
This paper presents a simple game theoretic framework, assuming complete information, to model Bitcoin mining activity. It does so by formalizing the activity as an all-pay contest: a competition where participants contend with each other to win a prize by investing in computational power, and victory is probabilistic. With at least two active miners, the unique pure strategy Nash equilibrium of the game suggests the following interesting insights on the motivation for being a miner: while the optimal amount of energy consumption depends also on the reward for solving the puzzle, as long as the reward is positive the decision to be an active miner depends only on the mining costs. Moreover, the intrinsic structure of the mining activity seems to prevent the formation of a monopoly, because in an equilibrium with two miners, both of them will have positive expected profits for any level of the opponent’s costs. A monopoly could only form if the rate of return on investment were higher outside bitcoin.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom