
Eddy-covariance flux errors due to biases in gas concentration measurements: origins, quantification and correction
Author(s) -
Gerardo Fratini,
D. K. McDermitt,
Dario Papale
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
biogeosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1726-4189
pISSN - 1726-4170
DOI - 10.5194/bg-11-1037-2014
Subject(s) - eddy covariance , calibration , computation , flux (metallurgy) , covariance , observational error , field (mathematics) , turbulence , environmental science , statistics , statistical physics , mathematics , physics , algorithm , mechanics , chemistry , ecology , organic chemistry , ecosystem , pure mathematics , biology
Errors in gas concentration measurements by infrared gas analysers can occurduring eddy-covariance campaigns, associated with actual or apparentinstrumental drifts or biases due to thermal expansion, dirtcontamination, aging of components or errors in field operations. Ifoccurring on long timescales (hours to days), these errors are normallyignored during flux computation, under the assumption that errors in meangas concentrations do not affect the estimation of turbulent fluctuationsand, hence, of covariances. By analysing instrument theory of operation, andusing numerical simulations and field data, we show that this is not thecase for instruments with curvilinear calibrations; we further show that ifnot appropriately accounted for, concentration biases can lead to roughlyproportional systematic flux errors, where the fractional errors in fluxesare about 30–40% the fractional errors in concentrations. We quantifythese errors and characterize their dependency on main determinants. We thenpropose a correction procedure that largely – potentially completely –eliminates these errors. The correction, to be applied during fluxcomputation, is based on knowledge of instrument calibration curves and onfield or laboratory calibration data. Finally, we demonstrate the occurrenceof such errors and validate the correction procedure by means of a fieldexperiment, and accordingly provide recommendations for in situ operations