z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Has Funding Made a Difference to Research Methods?
Author(s) -
Platt Jennifer
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
sociological research online
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.593
H-Index - 49
ISSN - 1360-7804
DOI - 10.5153/sro.7
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , foundation (evidence) , sociology , political science , work (physics) , positive economics , public administration , economics , law , biochemistry , chemistry , mechanical engineering , engineering
It has been argued that foundation funding has distorted methods in Americansociology in the direction of quantification. This argument rests on a number ofassumptions, of which the key one is that in the absence of such funding, methodwould have developed differently. Data on the methods of funded and unfundedresearch articles are analysed, and show that the trend to increasing levels ofquantification is almost equally present in unfunded work, which suggests thatfunding should not be held responsible for the trend.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom