z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An Alternative Ethics? Justice and Care as Guiding Principles for Qualitative Research
Author(s) -
Hammersley Martyn,
Traianou Anna
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
sociological research online
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.593
H-Index - 49
ISSN - 1360-7804
DOI - 10.5153/sro.3466
Subject(s) - framing (construction) , sociology , research ethics , qualitative research , engineering ethics , economic justice , ethics of care , meta ethics , social justice , epistemology , environmental ethics , social science , information ethics , political science , law , philosophy , structural engineering , engineering
The dominant conception of social research ethics is centred on deontological and consequentialist principles. In place of this, some qualitative researchers have proposed a very different approach. This appeals to a range of commitments that transform the goal of research as well as framing how it is pursued. This new ethics demands a participatory form of inquiry, one in which the relationship between researchers and researched is equalized. In this paper we examine this alternative approach, focusing in particular on two of the principles that are central to it: justice and care. We argue that there are some significant defects and dangers associated with this new conception of research ethics.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom