z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Egg recovery completed with a “manually-created” negative pressure is still an option in cases of emergency or “low-cost” in vitro fertilization?
Author(s) -
Theodoros Kalampokas,
Abha Maheswari
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of the turkish-german gynecological association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.346
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 1309-0399
pISSN - 1309-0380
DOI - 10.5152/jtgga.2015.15069
Subject(s) - suction , in vitro fertilisation , human fertilization , syringe , oocyte , pregnancy , medicine , biology , embryo , engineering , psychiatry , genetics , mechanical engineering , microbiology and biotechnology , anatomy
This is a report of a case of an egg recovery procedure completed with manual suction instead of the automated negative pressure suction. A 35-year-old woman who was undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment had to undergo oocyte recovery using manual suction through a syringe instead of the automated negative pressure suction systems because of the failure of both the initial and replacement systems. The treatment cycle ended in a positive pregnancy test and a clinical pregnancy with acceptable oocyte fertilization rates and no complications during procedure. The case presented may be an implication for an alternative implementation in cases of emergency, particularly when low-cost IVF is a target.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom