Egg recovery completed with a “manually-created” negative pressure is still an option in cases of emergency or “low-cost” in vitro fertilization?
Author(s) -
Theodoros Kalampokas,
Abha Maheswari
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of the turkish-german gynecological association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.346
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 1309-0399
pISSN - 1309-0380
DOI - 10.5152/jtgga.2015.15069
Subject(s) - suction , in vitro fertilisation , human fertilization , syringe , oocyte , pregnancy , medicine , biology , embryo , engineering , psychiatry , genetics , mechanical engineering , microbiology and biotechnology , anatomy
This is a report of a case of an egg recovery procedure completed with manual suction instead of the automated negative pressure suction. A 35-year-old woman who was undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment had to undergo oocyte recovery using manual suction through a syringe instead of the automated negative pressure suction systems because of the failure of both the initial and replacement systems. The treatment cycle ended in a positive pregnancy test and a clinical pregnancy with acceptable oocyte fertilization rates and no complications during procedure. The case presented may be an implication for an alternative implementation in cases of emergency, particularly when low-cost IVF is a target.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom