A randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section | Zendy

Shyama Prasad Saha | Zendy; Nabendu Bhattarcharjee | Zendy; Sabysachi Das Mahanta | Zendy; Animesh Naskar | Zendy; Sanjoy Kumar Bhattacharyya | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section

Author(s) -

Shyama Prasad Saha,

Nabendu Bhattarcharjee,

Sabysachi Das Mahanta,

Animesh Naskar,

Sanjoy Kumar Bhattacharyya

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

journal of the turkish-german gynecological association

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.346

H-Index - 16

eISSN - 1309-0399

pISSN - 1309-0380

DOI - 10.5152/jtgga.2013.07

Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , gestational age , randomized controlled trial , anesthesia , abdomen , pregnancy , genetics , biology

Pfanennstiel incision is the most commonly used incision for cesarean section, but may not be the best. This study compared the modified Joel-Cohen incision with the Pfannenstiel incision to evaluate whether techniques to open the abdomen might influence operative time, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research