z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Seborrheic Keratosis or Squamous Carcinoma? Clinical Examination versus Biopsy: The Importance of Criticism
Author(s) -
Arianna Di Stadio,
Maurizio Amadori,
Laura Dipietro,
Roberta Colangeli,
Maurizio Falcioni,
Giampietro Ricci,
Daniele Frezza
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the journal of international advanced otology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.518
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 2148-3817
pISSN - 1308-7649
DOI - 10.5152/iao.2019.5383
Subject(s) - medicine , seborrheic keratosis , lesion , radiology , differential diagnosis , magnetic resonance imaging , biopsy , histopathology , pathology
We compare the results of clinical observation and histopathology analysis for developing a differential diagnosis of seborrheic keratosis (SK) of the external auditory canal (EAC). A 46-year-old man with a history of a recurrent lesion in the EAC underwent clinical observation of the skin lesion's appearance, computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and several biopsies. Initially, a benign form of SK was diagnosed based on several biopsies performed over a 10-year period. The lesion's appearance was consistent with a malignant disease, which led the clinician to perform a CT scan and an MRI scan. The patient underwent partial petrosectomy to completely remove the lesion as CT and MRI scans showed an infiltrative process. Squamous carcinoma was the final histological diagnosis. The patient was disease free at 1 year of follow-up after petrosectomy. In conclusion, if there are inconsistencies between clinical observation and histological report, additional tests should be performed to exclude the malignity of a lesion.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom