Comparison of a Traditional and Novel Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recording Approach and Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Pediatric Cochlear Implants Users | Zendy

Laura Cavallé Garrido | Zendy; Konrad Schwarz | Zendy; Kathrin Lauss | Zendy; Carlos de Paula Vernetta | Zendy; Alejandra Kontides | Zendy; Miguel Diaz Gomez | Zendy; Abel Guzmán Calvete | Zendy; Miguel Armengot Carceller | Zendy

Open Access

Comparison of a Traditional and Novel Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recording Approach and Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Pediatric Cochlear Implants Users

Author(s) -

Laura Cavallé Garrido,

Konrad Schwarz,

Kathrin Lauss,

Carlos de Paula Vernetta,

Alejandra Kontides,

Miguel Diaz Gomez,

Abel Guzmán Calvete,

Miguel Armengot Carceller

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

the journal of international advanced otology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.518

H-Index - 13

eISSN - 2148-3817

pISSN - 1308-7649

DOI - 10.5152/iao.2018.5591

Subject(s) - audiology , brainstem , compound muscle action potential , evoked potential , auditory brainstem response , medicine , cochlear implant , electrophysiology , hearing loss

Electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) recordings are widely used in functional evaluation and fitting of cochlear implants (CI) in clinics. We compared the results from two eCAP recording approaches (StandardART and FineGrain, MED-EL, Austria). The FineGrain method is more advanced than the Auditory Nerve Response Telemetry (StandardART) method in terms of the stimulation and algorithm for the eCAP threshold detection. To understand the benefits of these alterations, we compared the two methods on a larger scale in pediatric CI users alongside evoked auditory brainstem responses (eABR).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research