English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Results: In the present study, 1317 patients with a possible cervical spine injury were included. It was confirmed that the numbers of excluded and included patients according to NLC were 1014 and 303, respectively. In excluded patients, 479 (36.3%) did not have any radiology, but in 535 (52.7%) of them, unnecessary radiological imaging studies were administered. The trauma mechanism was crash at the same level in 310 (23.5%) of the total and 267 (26.3%) of the excluded patients. In addition, in-vehicle traffic accident was observed in 64 (21.1%) included patients. It was found that the number of cervical spine injuries was four in the excluded and 10 in the included groups, which was confirmed according to NLC.

Impact of NEXUS Low-Risk Criterias on cervical injuries in Turkish tertiary care hospital