English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

variation has recently emerged as a major concern in the design of circuits including interconnect in current nanometer regime. Process variation leads to uncertainties of circuit performances such as propagation delay. The performance of VLSI/ULSI chip is becoming less predictable as MOSFET channel dimensions shrinks to nanometer scale. The reduced predictability can be ascribed to poor control of the physical features of devices and interconnects during the manufacturing process. Variations in these quantities maps to variations in the electrical behavior of circuits. The interconnect line resistance and capacitance varies due to changes in interconnect width and thickness, substrate, implant impurity level, and surface charge. This paper provides an analysis of the effect of interconnect parasitic variation on the propagation delay through driver- interconnect-load (DIL) system. The impact of process induced variations on propagation delay of the circuit is discussed for three different fabrication technologies i.e 130nm, 70nm and 45nm. The comparison between three technologies interestingly shows that the effect of line resistive and capacitive parasitics variation on propagation delay has almost uniform trend as feature size shrinks. However, resistive parasitic variation in global interconnects has very nominal effect on the propagation delay as compared to capacitive parasitics. Propagation delay variation is from 0.01% to 0.04% and -4.32% to 18.1% due to resistive and capacitive deviation of -6.1% to 25% respectively. Keywordsvariation, interconnects, VLSI, parasitic, propagation delay.

Monte Carlo Analysis of Propagation Delay Deviation due to Process Induced Line Parasitic Variations in Global VLSI Interconnects