English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Different class of stakeholders of Computational Grid has their own perspective and preferences, which result in different, often contradictory, criteria for scheduling (main step of grid resource management). To increase the level of satisfaction of different class of stakeholders grid management system must use the scheduling heuristic, which provides compromise solution (i.e. a compromise schedule) using the many conflicting objectives. Present work analysed, conflicting as well as harmonious, interactions of Many-Objectives and performed many objective comparison to find the most suited heuristics out of the twelve popular heuristics by1Visualization objectives of using 3D Bar Chart and Radar Chart in manner suggested, 2Non-dominated Ranking of Heuristics and 3-Qualitative Comparison. Emphasis is given to computation time taken by heuristics.

Many Objective Comparison of Twelve Grid Scheduling Heuristics