Factors Influencing Relational Satisfaction Within An Agricultural Education Mentoring Program

Sequential 3 13.04 2 8.70 Abstract Random 1 4.35 3 13.04Random 1 4.35 3 13.04 In order to further analyze the pairings of mentors and proteges and assess similarities in Mind StyleTM, Table 6 provides a listing of mentor/protege combinations, and the frequencies and percentages for each pairing. The most frequent combination is CS–CS (47.83%), although 13% of were categorized as CR–CS. Half of the possible combinations did not appear in our study. It should be noted that the combinations reflect mentor/protege pairs, in that order. Table 6 Comparison of Mentor and Protege Relational Satisfaction within Mind Style Pairs (n = 23 pairs)