Extension Administrators Approach To Conflict Management: A Study Of Relationships Between Conflict Management Styles And Personality Type
Author(s) -
Garee W. Earnest,
N. L. McCaslin
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of agricultural education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2162-5212
pISSN - 1042-0541
DOI - 10.5032/jae.1994.03018
Subject(s) - conflict management , psychology , extension (predicate logic) , social psychology , personality , agricultural education , management styles , conflict resolution , role conflict , applied psychology , public relations , political science , sociology , social science , agriculture , computer science , programming language , ecology , biology
Dealing with conflict between and among individuals can be one of the most frustrating and uncomfortable experiences for administrators. According to Schmidt and Tannenbaum (1960), when conflict occurs “strong feelings are frequently aroused, objectivity flies out the window, egos are threatened, and personal relationships are placed in jeopardy” (p. 107). Robbins (1974) stated that “any attempt by an administrator to alter a specific conflict position requires that he [sic] be knowledgeable of its origin. An understanding of the source improves the probability that the proper resolution or stimulation technique will be selected” (p. 29).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom