English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

According to agricultural education department heads and research experts, the second highest priority research topic in agricultural education is to “determine the appropriate curriculum for agricultural education in the secondary schools” (Silva-Guerrero and Sutphin, 1990, p.6). A common practice used to determine curriculum is to develop pilot courses and evaluate the courses to determine whether they should be included in the curriculum. Teacher perceptions are often a major part of the evaluation of these courses (Norris and Briers, 1989; Peasley & Henderson, 1992). The study reported in this article used teacher perceptions as one way of determining whether an agriscience course or courses should be part of the secondary agricultural education curriculum in Mississippi.

Perceptions Of Mississippi Secondary Agriculture Teachers Concerning Pilot Agriscience Courses