Perceptions Of Mississippi Secondary Agriculture Teachers Concerning Pilot Agriscience Courses
Author(s) -
Michael Newman,
Donald M. Johnson
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of agricultural education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2162-5212
pISSN - 1042-0541
DOI - 10.5032/jae.1993.03049
Subject(s) - agricultural education , agriculture , perception , mathematics education , psychology , secondary education , agricultural science , pedagogy , agricultural economics , geography , environmental science , economics , archaeology , neuroscience
According to agricultural education department heads and research experts, the second highest priority research topic in agricultural education is to “determine the appropriate curriculum for agricultural education in the secondary schools” (Silva-Guerrero and Sutphin, 1990, p.6). A common practice used to determine curriculum is to develop pilot courses and evaluate the courses to determine whether they should be included in the curriculum. Teacher perceptions are often a major part of the evaluation of these courses (Norris and Briers, 1989; Peasley & Henderson, 1992). The study reported in this article used teacher perceptions as one way of determining whether an agriscience course or courses should be part of the secondary agricultural education curriculum in Mississippi.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom